Where does Qahta end and RSF(Al-Da’ami )begin?

Ibrahim Osman

Dr. Alaa El-Din Naqd: (Wad Al-Noura, yes, it is a great tragedy, but the reason for it was also the SAF, the mobilization, the rallying, and the popular resistance, in three very, very clear videos, in which the National Congress Party NCO and the Islamic Movement are supplying weapons to citizens, and putting them in front of the military machine of the Rapid Support Forces RSF.
From attitudes and statements of Alaa Naqd and those with him, a long list of axioms and conclusions can be extracted that prove that the details of Qahta and the rebels are the same, the enmities and friendships are identical, the mutual dependence is typical, the lines are intertwined, the borders are absent, and it is not easy to know where the Qahta ends and the Da’ami begins!
We cannot say for sure that all the Qahta believe in the rebels’ right to loot and rape, but we can assert and confirm that they believe in their right not to be resisted by anyone if they decide to loot and rape!
In the war on civilians, Qahta also talk about the first “aggression” bullets in peaceful villages, behind which the army, Islamists, and resistant citizens stand, and they are more deserving of condemnation than the justified “aggression response” bullets!
No matter how much they brag about neutrality, the Central and Coordination groups cannot be truly neutral in a war in which Islamists support one of the sides!
We can assert that they believe in the rebels’ right to invade villages to search for Islamist citizens and kill or kidnap them, and they do not believe in their right to leave or resist, because leaving is escape and resistance is terrorism!
No matter how much they brag about peace, they cannot – just as Arman and Asmaa Mahmoud could not – prevent themselves from celebrating the destructive military actions that they see as hitting Islamists and making war useful!
The condemnations of the Central and Coordination Groups for the crimes of the rebels are condemnations of raising reproach that they are forced to do, and they usually come as a dull, objecting sentence that they quickly jump over as if they are jumping over a fire pit, then they cancel it immediately after the jump is over and adopt the defense of the rebels, and condemn those they condemn!
No matter how much they talk about not (involving) them in the war, it is not easy to imagine the Qahta refraining from (cooperating) with the rebels, at least in military operations related to (useful destruction)! Compared to the type and size of the “public” services they perform after leaving the country, it is difficult to imagine their refraining from “secret” services now or when they were inside!
The rebels looted most of the cars in the violated cities and villages, and for a whole year, no Qahta anti/Coordination leader uttered the letter “s” in the word car, even about those cars looted from areas and used to invade and loot other areas! To prove that Alaa Naqd and those with him are biased towards the rebels, you only need to reverse the situation, and imagine that the SAF- Allah forbid it would do that – invaded the villages in order to loot, plunder, rape, etc., and imagine that what happened in Wad al-Noura and other violated villages happened there, and imagine that the Qahta will condemn the people of the villages for resistance and the parties opposing the SAF for inciting resistance!
Hold the incubator accountable for the one you hound incubator for the one because it is with him against you, and it does not even have the luxury of pretending otherwise!