Al-Wathiq Kamir and a Dialogue on Geneva 

Zain Al-Abidin Saleh Abdul Rahman

The audio commentary of Dr. Al-Wathiq Kamir on “Geneva Negotiations” in which he demanded that it be an introduction to dialogue between more than censorship issues, and the two Yemeni discoveries, and even the leaderships of the political powers and he considers the smart and good effort to move the dialogue from the state of polarization in society, to an intellectual dialogue that helps present opinions and thinks not only that the war stops until it goes beyond it to after the war.. Dr. Al-Wathiq then used to use “Nivasha 2005” to present visions with the aim of moving the dialogue from a dialogue that relies on slogans, to an intellectual dialogue that tries to penetrate and allows for the presentation of suggestions through its perception.. Where Al-Wathiq used to publish it in a number of newspapers that target intellectuals of copyright, politicians who have diverse affiliations, and even readers of all colors and shapes, and now they present it about the “anticipated Geneva Negotiations” not to be added to the rest of the other visions “for – against” but to open windows between the currents in order to enter into a rational dialogue that helps in the existence of a different third way. Dr. Al-Wathiq explains that there are three factors: America’s labor is rushing to hold “Geneva negotiations” and rushing himself and only him to make mistakes and not improving the agenda including it, and the factor is: –

1 – Special security fees to Ethiopia, which the militia is working to try to crawl to the Sudanese-Ethiopian border.

2 – Sudanese transformations in the international arena to Brazilian and Iranian military will actually disturb the American administration.

3 – Democratic work in America, which is related to the position of the ruling party now “Democratic” meaning that it will be cancelled in the election campaign.

Al-Wathiq referred to the role of the Swiss envoy to the Horn of Africa, who visited Port Sudan and met with leaders in sports and the military, and also visited Saudi Arabia. Al-Wathiq believes that perhaps “Geneva negotiations” are an agreement of the Switzerland envoy, including the idea of transferring the mission from Jeddah to Geneva, and perhaps these deals are what depend on working on the Switzerland arrangements for that reason because it is an agenda objectively, but it is considered for the participants, and what are the conditions for their success..

Regarding “Geneva negotiations”, is the presence of observers in the talks a successful presence? Dr. Kamir believes that as long as the Emirates is considered a sponsor of the militias and provides them with support, therefore it must be new to participate directly in its basic session.

After what Dr. Kamir presented his vision during a short period of analysis of Google’s events, a question was posed to the guests: Will Geneva’s talk succeed in stopping the war? Especially since America and the European envoys believe that there is a face between the two generals, which is the way to that which will lead to stopping the war, particularly since the militia may lose control over its soldiers on the ground, and thus needs its leader to help control it.. Is this the militia or does the Emirates want it? ? Loud dialogue is essential between intellectuals of other trends, along with political elites, looking for solutions to the successive crises of Sudan’s form..

But the question itself is: Does it have anything to do with an honest and reliable mediator? The history of agreement between Sudan and America indicates a lack of trust in the relationship, not only in the friendship stage, but before the rescue and especially in the third friendship.

It affirms that US always seeks its own interests first and foremost, without needing more for the interests of others, and is America itself far from the many attempts made by the militia and the failure only reason they were in the active war now..

And was America not aware that the Emirates supports the militia with weapons and all the equipment required in the war?

And why is its first mind for a way out for the Emirates so that it does not fall under the yoke of international law..

The insistence of the cart that was led by the giant bet on a specific group during the period of the “framework agreement” without considering the other powers, is it not what led to the war, here comes the fear, that America’s efforts aim to reach the process of “marketing” the army between the militias to include the agenda of the “framework agreement” in the same way it was..

This is what the UAE is striving for and seeking, and it cannot be considered a state of one of the actors who led the war and at the same time be an honest mediator.. The problem, Dr. Al-Watheq, is in the political powers that always wait for the outside to come to them with solutions. The “framework agreement” was the idea of US Assistant Secretary of State “Molly Phee” and the famous political powers , as they considered it to represent their mechanism for power.. After the war,US and the European Union EU discovered that the leadership of the framework had become unacceptable to the people, so the US State Department came up with the idea of “progress” and independent leadership, and they also failed to specify their signing of a military declaration with the militia in Addis Ababa.. The development of the central Qaht.

If there is, it will be confined to working away from politics, and thus the future of political work, its path will be determined by the results of the auxiliary program if it is between the two sides. I do not think that there are effective political forces to participate as you demand, and they do not have any visions for a solution other than the reserve force. We pray to God for good insight.