{"id":35936,"date":"2024-11-08T22:51:02","date_gmt":"2024-11-08T19:51:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/?p=35936"},"modified":"2024-11-08T22:51:02","modified_gmt":"2024-11-08T19:51:02","slug":"the-return-of-trump-what-does-it-mean-for-sudan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/2024\/11\/08\/the-return-of-trump-what-does-it-mean-for-sudan\/","title":{"rendered":"The Return of Trump: What Does It Mean for Sudan?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div dir=\"auto\"><strong>Dr. Dardiri Mohamed Ahmed, Former Foreign Minister<\/strong><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">The election of U.S. President Donald Trump in 2016 and the policies he pursued in his first term led to an accelerated shift toward a multipolar international system. Thus, Trump\u2019s tenure marked the end of the so-called \u201cUnipolar Moment,\u201d which began with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, and the emergence of a still-developing multipolar order. Under the banner of \u201cAmerica First,\u201d the U.S. stepped back from its traditional global leadership, allowing other nations to play more prominent roles on the international stage. The trade war with China, for instance, bolstered China\u2019s global standing and extended its economic strategy through the Belt and Road Initiative. Meanwhile, Trump\u2019s relatively lenient approach toward Russia provided it with the latitude to expand its influence in Europe and the Middle East. Additionally, Trump\u2019s criticism of NATO\u2019s dependency on the U.S. pushed European nations to adopt a policy of \u201cstrategic independence\u201d and set minimum defense spending goals. The decreased American intervention worldwide also allowed regional powers, such as India, Turkey, Brazil, and Israel, to pursue influence within their regions. Hence, a significant anticipated effect of Trump\u2019s return would be the reinforcement of a multipolar international order. This concerns the global arena.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">On the African level, which provides insight into the potential implications of Trump\u2019s return for Sudan, Trump\u2019s first term saw a notable disengagement from traditional U.S. intervention in Africa across key areas. The U.S. reduced its involvement in nation-building, conflict resolution, peacekeeping, and humanitarian aid. If Trump continues this approach in his new administration, it is likely to further reduce American costs in Africa, particularly in peacekeeping operations, and minimize the U.S. military presence in Africa\u2014as he did previously by cutting U.S. forces in the Sahel region\u2014and scale back developmental and humanitarian aid programs. Moreover, as in his prior term, Trump is expected to direct aid based on clear U.S. strategic interests rather than as part of broader nation-building efforts in targeted African states.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">The previous Trump administration was also known for its reluctance to resolve conflicts or support peace efforts. It showed little interest in diplomatic efforts to resolve crises in regions such as South Sudan and the Central African Republic, where Trump\u2019s administration did not oppose Sudan\u2019s mediation under former President Bashir. The Democratic Republic of Congo was similarly left open to other nations, such as France, and regional organizations like the African Union, to work on resolving its disputes.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Additionally, during Trump\u2019s first term, Africa was a focal point in the U.S.-China competition. Trump focused on sidelining China in Africa rather than building substantial developmental partnerships or alliances with African nations. John Bolton, Trump\u2019s National Security Advisor, was the architect of the \u201cNew Africa Strategy\u201d introduced in 2018. Based on this policy, the Trump administration aimed to curtail Chinese influence on the continent, especially in infrastructure projects and natural resources, without offering alternatives for African nations. This approach led to reduced support from U.S. agencies for development projects in Africa, prompting African countries to strengthen ties with China, which offers financing on flexible terms without attaching political conditions.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Thus, the expected impact of Trump\u2019s return on Africa would be a reduction in direct intervention, linking U.S. support to strategic interests without significant funding commitments or direct involvement in conflict resolution. Trump\u2019s African priorities would likely be more economic and commercial than political or humanitarian, focusing on curbing Chinese, and possibly Russian, influence through trade agreements and investments by major American corporations.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">While Bolton is unlikely to return in Trump\u2019s new administration, given the strained end of his previous tenure and public criticism of Trump, his Africa policy is expected to persist as it aligns with Trump\u2019s general approach. Mark Green, USAID director during Trump\u2019s first term, played a significant role in implementing this policy by reducing fully funded projects. Green\u2019s return is possible, despite not being a prominent figure expected to rejoin the administration, as he supported a more gradual approach to executing Bolton\u2019s strategy while maintaining some development aid continuity.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">One of the prominent U.S. diplomats who managed African affairs during Trump\u2019s term was Tibor Nagy, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs. Known for advocating economic partnerships with African nations, Nagy supported excluding China from Africa but emphasized \u201cequitable partnerships\u201d with Africans instead of direct confrontation with China. Nagy was one of the few U.S. diplomats closely following Sudan\u2019s situation. His tenure coincided with mine in the Foreign Ministry, and we were in frequent contact, working to advance Sudanese issues. After the April 2019 change, Nagy became the first Western diplomat to visit Sudan. He is respected among Republicans and could return in any future Republican administration that adopts a flexible approach toward Africa. However, Trump\u2019s tendency to reduce engagement may not align with Nagy\u2019s calls for collaboration and alliance-building.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Another notable diplomat from Trump\u2019s first administration involved in Sudanese issues was Cyril Sartor, Senior Advisor to the National Security Council for African Affairs. Sartor, with extensive African expertise, served for years in the CIA specializing in African affairs. While supportive of Trump\u2019s China and Russia containment strategy in Africa, Sartor believed in strengthening economic and security relations with African nations in line with U.S. national security priorities. Sartor, a Republican diplomat familiar with Sudanese affairs, first met me in Washington during my initial U.S. visit as Foreign Minister in September 2018. Despite an intense initial meeting, we later established good relations, leading to his visit to Khartoum in January 2019, where fruitful negotiations were held on lifting U.S. sanctions against Sudan.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Another key diplomat for Sudan in Trump\u2019s prior administration was Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan, responsible for African affairs and lifting sanctions against Sudan. Sullivan\u2019s term as Deputy Secretary (2017\u20132019) saw active diplomatic engagement with Sudan, playing a pivotal role in the partial lifting of sanctions in 2017 as part of U.S. efforts to support Sudan\u2019s smooth political transition. However, his potential return to Trump\u2019s administration is unlikely due to his recent tenure as U.S. Ambassador to Russia and diverging views on Russia from Trump.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Some wonder why Gulf leaders, especially in the UAE, favor Trump\u2019s return and if this would mean support for UAE\u2019s position on Sudan. Gulf nations welcome Trump due to his previous administration\u2019s stance on Iran, close security cooperation, major arms deals, and the fostering of Gulf investments in the U.S., along with a lenient stance on human rights criticisms. Trump\u2019s first term also supported Gulf-Israel normalization, expecting the Abraham Accords to reshape the regional landscape by sidelining movements like Hamas and isolating Sunni and Shia Islamist groups. However, whether the new Trump administration would support UAE\u2019s stance on Sudan is unclear.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Republican administrations, especially Trump\u2019s, are generally disinterested in democracy-building projects, meaning a new Trump administration would likely disregard reviving the framework agreement or supporting any particular civilian groups in Sudan. Additionally, the criticisms in major U.S. media like the New York Times of the UAE\u2019s Sudan policy weaken the chances of Trump endorsing it. Following recent regional developments, the Abraham Accords, which once drew Sudan into Trump\u2019s priority files, are unlikely to regain the same prominence, as current international priorities have shifted toward the two-state solution rather than sidelining the Palestinian cause through normalization with Israel.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">Before concluding, it is important to note that the author has closely followed the ongoing U.S. debate regarding the \u201cProject 2025\u201d document and whether it represents the blueprint for Trump\u2019s upcoming domestic policies\u2014a claim that Trump denies. Others, including The Wall Street Journal, suggest that Trump\u2019s future policies will likely be shaped by the America First Agenda. Regardless of which perspective holds, the author finds little in either document to suggest that Trump\u2019s new administration would deviate from the foreign policy approach of his first term.<\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\"><\/div>\n<div dir=\"auto\">In conclusion, a new Trump administration represents a lesser evil in American politics, and perhaps an optimistic observer might view it as the best gift for Sudan\u2019s leadership and military. The changes Trump brings to the international scene provide Sudan with a rare opportunity to forge beneficial foreign relations to aid in winning the war quickly and building partnerships for reconstruction. It also marks a significant blow to groups like \u201cTaqaddam\u201d and their rapid support.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dr. Dardiri Mohamed Ahmed, Former Foreign Minister The election of U.S. President Donald Trump in 2016 and the policies he pursued in his first term led to an accelerated shift toward a multipolar international system. Thus, Trump\u2019s tenure marked the end of the so-called \u201cUnipolar Moment,\u201d which began with the fall of the Berlin Wall &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":3167,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35936"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35936\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35937,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35936\/revisions\/35937"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3167"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}