{"id":57801,"date":"2025-11-26T21:58:22","date_gmt":"2025-11-26T18:58:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/?p=57801"},"modified":"2025-11-28T23:01:48","modified_gmt":"2025-11-28T20:01:48","slug":"a-dead-man-washing-a-killer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/2025\/11\/26\/a-dead-man-washing-a-killer\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cA Dead Man Washing a Killer\u201d!"},"content":{"rendered":"

As I see<\/strong><\/p>\n

Adil El-Baz<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

1
The mouthpieces of the collaborators in \u201cSumood\u201d and their follower, Massad Bolus, are attempting to present a sycophantic narrative to whitewash the militia\u2019s crimes\u2014crimes that cannot be cleansed by all the water on earth. Their hypocritical discourse is built on three narratives: the first is to downplay the militia\u2019s atrocities; the second is to equate the army\u2019s violations with isolated incidents and errors that occur in all armies during war; and the third is denial and falsification of facts.<\/p>\n

The narratives of Massad Bolus and the \u201cSumood\u201d platforms attempt to shape reality in ways that serve the militia\u2014narratives intended to mislead public consciousness, each trying to achieve an impossible mission: washing a blood-soaked hand. Yet global evidence\u2014from UN and international reports to major newspapers\u2014has demolished these narratives one by one.<\/p>\n

2
The first narrative was downplaying. The militia\u2019s propagandists claim: \u201cThere is no genocide\u2026 what happened was merely communal conflict.\u201d<\/em> Some even went as far as saying: \u201cTalk of mass rape is media exaggeration,\u201d<\/em> as Alaa Al-Din Naqd stated. But international reports left them no room to escape. Every major reputable newspaper in the world published documented images of the crimes and carried live testimonies from displaced people. All human rights organizations issued reports from the ground. Dozens of research centers and rights groups\u2014and even the latest Amnesty International report in November 2025\u2014described the atrocities committed by the militia in El-Fasher, just as they had previously described what happened in Geneina as \u201cthe worst wave of ethnic violence in Africa in the past decade.\u201d<\/em> The reports confirmed that the attacks were not wartime chaos but organized operations targeting specific groups. Even the United Nations, despite its cautious language, was forced to acknowledge that 82 countries condemned the militia\u2019s \u201cplanned\u201d attacks on civilians. These facts suffocated the first narrative entirely.<\/p>\n

3
The second narrative was the false equivalence: \u201cAll parties committed crimes; the army and the RSF are the same.\u201d<\/em> Some of Bolus\u2019s writers repeated: \u201cNo one is innocent in this war,\u201d<\/em> while others claimed that \u201cthe army committed worse.\u201d<\/em> Their aim was not analysis but deception\u2014placing the victim and the perpetrator on the same moral plane. But the facts struck this illusion hard. The army, despite all pressures, announced investigations into any individual violations\u2014behavior of an institutional force subject to the law. The militia, however, committed systematic crimes acknowledged by the world: satellite images from Maxar and Planet Labs showed entire neighborhoods burned; Yale HRL documented mass graves and ethnic cleansing; survivors recounted mass rape carried out under high command orders; and The New York Times<\/em> documented identity-based killings in the streets of Darfur. All this shattered the second narrative and restored the moral distinction between a state and a militia.<\/p>\n

4
The third narrative was outright denial\u2014and here the collaborators\u2019 rhetoric reaches its peak in shamelessness: \u201cThere were no massacres\u2026 the images are fabricated,\u201d<\/em> \u201cThere are no mass graves\u2026 they\u2019re natural pits.\u201d<\/em> This denial equates crime with nonexistence, as if Geneina had not been annihilated, as if El-Fasher had not been slaughtered. But the evidence came like a flood. Satellite images pinpointed the mass graves and recorded the burning of neighborhoods and the militia\u2019s movements. The Guardian<\/em> published its shocking report, \u201cThey slaughtered us like animals,\u201d<\/em> containing direct testimonies of rape, child murder in front of mothers, and roadside executions. The BBC<\/em> documented the use of rape as a weapon of war, and the Associated Press<\/em> described what occurred as \u201cethnic cleansing clearly targeting specific groups.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

This overwhelming evidence crushed the denial narrative entirely, turning anyone who repeats it into a partner in the crime, not a messenger.<\/p>\n

5
Thus, the three narratives\u2014downplaying, false equivalence, and denial\u2014collapse whenever confronted with truth. The rhetoric of Massad Bolus and the \u201cSumood\u201d platforms cannot cover up a political corpse they refuse to acknowledge as dead. A militia that has committed every imaginable atrocity cannot have its record washed\u2014not by any water on earth. What \u201cSumood,\u201d its cohort, its mouthpieces, and its sponsors are attempting is impossible. How can the dead within the \u201cSumood\u201d alliance wash a killer whose crimes and victims\u2019 images stand as undeniable evidence against him?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As I see Adil El-Baz 1The mouthpieces of the collaborators in \u201cSumood\u201d and their follower, Massad Bolus, are attempting to present a sycophantic narrative to whitewash the militia\u2019s crimes\u2014crimes that cannot be cleansed by all the water on earth. Their hypocritical discourse is built on three narratives: the first is to downplay the militia\u2019s atrocities; …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":8232,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57801"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57801\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57916,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57801\/revisions\/57916"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8232"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sudanevents.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}