If There were no Kizan, they would have invented them

By: Mutasem Aqraa

One of the reasons why a large segment of the educated class calls on the Muslim Brothers’ scarecrow to suppress any political discussion that does not agree with their minds is the emptiness of these segments of any political culture other than the Muslim Brothers’ satanism. If the Kizan burn themselves and resign from the scene, these segments will find nothing to participate in the general political dialogue and will discover their deadly superficiality.
These segments simplified knowledge and preferred the comfortable illusion that the pinnacle of culture, the pinnacle of patriotism, and the pinnacle of morals are the curse of Kizan Sinsville. As long as man curses the creatures, every other responsibility has been lifted from him and all costs have been removed from him, and there is no need for research and scrutiny.
If he had returned to the one who said that religion is the opium of the people, he would have said that the dirt from the Kizan is the original opium and that fighting religious terrorism is one of the masks of modern colonialism. The documented misdeeds of the Muslim Brothers do not exempt the comprador from the duties of patriotism, nor does it justify the colonial tide. The Muslim Brothers scarecrow provides moral cover for the alliance between the compradors and colonialism and even their alliance with the Janjaweed.
Kizan is a player present in the scene, and it is natural to talk about them and attack them, but what is not permissible is to use them to distort the image of any dissenter, to suppress any other discussion that enriches the scene, and to spread them as a cover for the failure of others, their labor, their superficiality, their weak capabilities, and their loss of legitimacy that justifies their guardianship over the Sudanese people.