The UAE Paid… So the US Decided!

As I See

By Adel El-Baz

1
By God, is this the so-called “Great America”?! What greatness does it still possess now that it has become a pile of rotten bones? It is led by a corrupt and bribed president, as testified by Senator Sara Jacobs. Its economy is collapsing, its debt has reached trillions of dollars. It is no longer humanity’s dream, but a global nightmare. No longer the land of hope and promise, but a land of accumulated disappointments.

It has abandoned its values and no longer speaks of democracy. It denies human rights as they are being slaughtered in Gaza while it watches in silence. “Great America” has fallen, and its usurer president, Shylock, promises to restore its greatness… while he lies every day. His latest lie was exposed in yesterday’s Reuters scandal, when he used an image from a massacre in Congo and claimed it depicted white genocide in South Africa!

What’s the occasion?
Yesterday, the internet and satellite channels were buzzing with news that the US accused Sudan of using chemical weapons in its war against the Janjaweed!

When did Sudan commit this crime? The US doesn’t know—or hasn’t announced.
Where did it occur? “Nowhere!” The report didn’t specify a location in 2024.
Where are the Janjaweed victims? Unknown! No one knows them.
How was the crime committed? No one, not even the US, can say!

So, we are facing an accusation of a crime where the perpetrator is known, but there are no victims, no location, no time, and no method!

If I were an editor-in-chief and a junior trainee reporter brought me such a story, I would tear it up and throw it in the trash; it fails to meet any professional journalistic standards. It’s mere hearsay!

So how can a “great” nation accuse another country of such a grave crime without evidence or specifics? Then, based on that baseless accusation, impose immediate decisions and smear the reputation of a country that committed no crime?

Is this a great nation? Or a degenerate one that has abandoned the most basic principles of justice—namely, that an accused is innocent until proven guilty?

2
Let’s set aside America’s current decline; that’s well known. Accusations of chemical weapons use have been repeatedly made in conflict zones—from Iraq to Syria—and are often used as tools to legitimize foreign interventions, impose sanctions, or even justify invasions without conclusive evidence. The Iraq model remains vivid in our collective memory: a war based on the lie of “weapons of mass destruction” that were never found.

Now, let me tell you the story of this “bought-and-paid-for American decision” and the objectives its architects are aiming to achieve by spreading it.

On January 16, Declan Walsh and Julian E. Barnes wrote a report stating:
“Four senior U.S. officials said the Sudanese army used chemical weapons on at least two occasions against the paramilitary group it is fighting in the country.”

Four officials… no names, no titles, no evidence… just “sources”!

That marked the beginning of the orchestrated media chorus and additional players strumming the strings of lies.

Suddenly, a hired activist from the Qahati faction published an article on Euronews on January 22, 2025, titled:
“How Other Countries Are Exploiting Sudan’s Slide Into War.”

She wrote:
“The Sudanese Armed Forces face accusations of using chemical weapons, a blatant violation of international law.”

Then came Anwar Gargash with a tweet on April 9, 2025, saying:
“The Sudanese Armed Forces are trying to divert attention from their role in committing atrocities by using chemical weapons against civilians.”

He cited the article by Declan and Barnes.

Then the Emirati Ministry of Foreign Affairs, leading the “orchestra section” from behind, issued a statement through Lana Nusseibeh, Assistant Minister for Political Affairs, on April 15, 2025, saying:
“The Sudanese Armed Forces face accusations of using chemical weapons, a blatant violation of international law.”

Note: no source, no evidence… and yet the UAE shamelessly accuses another country!

3
On the same day, April 15, Kholood Khair appeared on Amanpour & Co. on CNN and PBS, saying:
“The Sudanese government used chemical weapons.”

This deceitful activist continued her toxic campaign, publishing another article in April 2025 on AllAfrica, stating:
“The Armed Forces lack credibility, including regarding allegations of genocide and chemical weapons use.”

She then toured research centers and paid media platforms, repeating the same lies until she reached the British Parliament!

On April 28, 2025, the UAE’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations issued a statement about Sudan, accusing the Armed Forces of using chemical weapons.

Then Gargash returned yesterday, after the U.S. State Department issued its decision, proudly celebrating the verdict they had already paid for:
“U.S. sanctions on the Sudanese army for using chemical weapons against its citizens put the dots on the letters: the war must end immediately, and a political process must lead to a civilian government.”

4
This accusation and the intense campaign began after Declan and Barnes’ report in January 2025—right after Sudan announced in December 2024 its intention to file a complaint.

The campaign escalated after Sudan officially filed a complaint against the UAE at the International Court of Justice on March 5, 2025. The court held a public hearing on April 10.

The U.S. State Department only notified Congress on March 5—after Sudan’s complaint.

Then, on April 15, an addendum to the “compliance report” was released—a technical intelligence document used to justify official decisions.

On April 24, 2025, the official U.S. decision was issued, just as the UAE was globally exposed as a state sponsoring militias committing genocide.

The decision came right before Trump’s visit to the UAE on May 15. Two days later, after the “compliance decision,” he received 1.5 trillion dollars!

Note the dates:

April 15: U.S. compliance report

April 15: Media campaign begins (Kholood Khair)

April 15: UAE UN Mission statement (Lana Nusseibeh)

5
From this, we understand that the U.S. decision is just part of the UAE’s war of aggression on Sudan.
They are using:

Bribery of U.S. officials

Buying off U.S. institutions

Deploying their media mouthpieces

Repeating lies in international forums

Pushing for a Security Council resolution

Possibly prompting international intervention based on the chemical weapons lie

The U.S. might support it… because it was paid in advance. And because it’s used to launching wars and imposing sanctions based on nonsense and lies!

Turkish ambassador Fatih Yazdi was right when he tweeted yesterday about the U.S. decision:
“They lost their credibility years ago, when they waged a war based on false claims about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.”

6
What is happening today is not a conflict over values or international law—it’s a battle over interests, influence, power, and money.
Money has bought the conscience—and the decision.
He who pays… decides.
The UAE paid… so America decided!