In Documenting the Decline of the Coalition Eager for Power

Amjad Farid Al-Tayeb
The coalition of what remains today of the Forces of Freedom and Change in its various guises, whether progressive or otherwise, believes that the practice of known media decadence and unleashing their thugs on social media to spread lies and abuse will succeed in deflecting criticism directed at their political performance by terrorizing others with political vulgarity and character assassination. Their approach to this is to cover up their inability to justify their positions by trying to create a false sanctity for them and monopolize the civil voice on the path to ruin that they seek, lusting for power, even if it comes at the expense of the nation and its people. But they can’t do that.
The difference with these people is that they were involved in an integrated internal and external employment system. Since the Rapid Support Forces bought some of their leadership cadres, it began with promises to satisfy their own ambitions for seats of power and justification with ethnic and regional policy proposals or with direct financial payment at the time. The bribes ranged from direct financial payments to Land Cruisers and double cab cars. I had written about this topic at the time, and the flock became angry.
Don’t the rest of the parties and groups of freedom and change know this? Rather, they know, and they deal with the matter regardless, avoiding confrontation and accepting it as a fait accompli in an effort to preserve their seats at the table, which they consider to be the table of political practice that exists and is the only possible one, and that it is the closest to achieving their desire to regain seats of power at any cost. What is surprising is that these are the same people who complain, in secret and in political public, about the hijacking of their decision and the control of a specific group over the decision and directions of freedom and change and its subsequent progress, while they reconcile with themselves under the illusion that they are making attempts at reform from within.
Naturally, these contradictions and attempts to gain power with weapons and seek help from one military party against the other exploded in the war that is destroying the country today.
These contradictions at the time spoiled any horizon for a political process to end the October 25 coup, because they were constantly bidding for power, to the point of some of them blatantly mocking the increasing number of martyrs in the anti-coup demonstrations while they were delaying the announcement of the agreement they had reached in pursuit of more personal gains by saying, “People die anyway.” It is as if these martyrs are merely numbers in the massacres of their lust to return to the seats of government.
The war broke out, and the same group engaged in the same approach as foreign workers, this time by shamelessly defending the countries and parties that support the continuation of the war in Sudan, but rather feeding the militia with weapons, equipment, unlimited financial support, and mercenaries. Immediately after the outbreak of the war, some of their leaders rushed to Washington to hold official meetings and consultations in which they promoted that stopping the war would be by recognizing Hemedti as President of Sudan, and that he is the legitimate leader of the official military establishment in Sudan. This astonished even the foreigners who were listening to them, and they then rushed into deception to the point of fabrication. Incidents and crimes of rape for the purpose of attributing them to the army in order to equate it with what continued to be committed by the mercenaries of the Rapid Support Forces. These people dealt with the crimes of the Rapid Support Forces militia as if they were normal, which the people of Sudan must accept for the sake of their return to seats of power! They did not flinch as they described countries like the Emirates and Chad as brothers and turned a blind eye to their continued support for the continuation of the war in Sudan. Rather, they rushed into attempts to change recent history and described it as providing support for the transition, as if they had forgotten what they knew well, that the Emirates had practiced the greatest possible amount of blackmail of all kinds to disrupt the transition. Moving and seeking to achieve its interests in plundering Sudan in alliance with the two military parties now allied, and before that it was the biggest instigator of the crime of dispersing the sit-in, and after that it participated, along with Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Russia, in supporting the October 25 coup! They want to erase all this recent history without realizing that people may be able to forgive, but they cannot forget!
The deterioration of the Freedom and Change group continues in its attempts to monopolize the civil voice, change the facts, and create alternative narratives (is it greater than the narrative of the Rapid Support Forces militia’s quest to achieve civil rule and democracy) by avoiding responding to the criticisms and facts with which they are confronted by distributing accusations that I threw at their inception and slipped away? For example, they talk about our criticism to them (whatever the topic might be) comes from personal disputes without anyone telling us what these differences are. Our differences with freedom and change are on these issues and they are declared in the public sphere, but what is truly personal is their decadence, which has left no families, no honor, and no moral low without deterioration. While others practice what they are accustomed to subordination and practicing politics in favor of whoever pays the most, while trying to fabricate jobs attributed to me, with all the contradictions possible in the world, and these people do not know or forget those behind them, that I am a descendant of a family that raised us on the full spring, and taught us that situations are not for buying and selling, and it is the same. The family whose hospitality they have reveled in in Sudan and around the world, over and over again, in my presence and in my absence, but they are negligent in planting misplaced good morals. As for political work, when I walked its paths and paid its dear prices, some of them who are bidding now were divided between options for personal survival in the diaspora or practicing currency trading and deceiving the leaders of the kingdom and the tycoons of corruption at the time.
Fraudulent bastards and fascist boys repeatedly accuse their teachers of calling us fickle between positions. Here they describe themselves. By the way, I have left the structures of the Forces of Freedom and Change since October 2019 – and my position on the issue of reforming the military institution has been clear and declared since the beginning of the transitional period, and when I was waging this battle in the media against it, the leaders of the current coalition were praising the skill of General Al-Burhan and the increase in the strength of the army during his reign. My position on the Rapid Support Forces and the necessity of not treating them as an institutional state body or an independent political body is known to them and others even before the coup, and my position against attempts to monopolize the civil voice, which included disrupting the formation of the transitional parliament, is also known to them and others and has been presented in public since the beginning of the transitional period! What are the positions in which the mouthpieces of freedom and change accuse us of fluctuating? But let us ask them about their position on non-political participation in the transitional government, which they could not wait to change. Or about their delaying the economic reform measures for more than a year and then adopting them after their cost had multiplied dozens of times and bragging about them as an achievement. Let us ask them about their adoption of slogans of no negotiation, no partnership, and no legitimacy, while they were negotiating in secret and in public about the return of partnership and after that on the framework, as if it was the blood of the martyrs. Those who walked the streets are of no value, or as one of them said (people are not supposed to die)! Let us ask them about the transformations that occurred that made them describe Hamdok as the secretary of the coup, and then later they chose him as the head of his alliance, the Alliance for the Remains of Freedom and Change. What the current progress shows is an alliance whose only compass is the lust for power, and some of its members and components believe in a right not based on reality to manage the country’s affairs with such acrobatics and foolishness. politically, even if it results in burning the country as we are witnessing in the current war. Their coalition and its members contributed to igniting its flames and prolonging this war, and now it continues its attempts to advance its political ambitions to stop the war by forcing the Sudanese to live with the violations and crimes committed by the Rapid Support.



